> On May 30, 2013, 2:09 p.m., Matěj Laitl wrote:
> > src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukCollection.cpp, lines 
> > 40-41
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108717/diff/11/?file=145267#file145267line40>
> >
> >     Okay, personal preferences aside, I'm sure that consistency within a 
> > project has more value than preferences of individual developers.
> >     
> >     There are about 25 .cpp files in current Amarok source code that embody 
> > all the method definitions into namespace XYZ {}. On the other hand, there 
> > are about 265 files that use using namespace XYZ; syntax for function 
> > definitions. Please improve, rather than fight, consistency.

It's not about consistency. Favouring the using-directive is not a question of 
style or preference.


> On May 30, 2013, 2:09 p.m., Matěj Laitl wrote:
> > src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukCollection.cpp, lines 
> > 93-102
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108717/diff/11/?file=145267#file145267line93>
> >
> >     I don't think you need to be an Observer anymore, do you? Or, it 
> > depends how you want to emit updated() signal, but as the tracks already 
> > have a pointer to NepomukCollection, they can somehow trigger it explicitly.
> >     
> >     I'm going to document where collections should emit updated() soon, it 
> > will read something like:
> >      a) when a set of entities change (tracks, albums, composers,...) 
> > removed or added
> >      b) when relationship between entities change, i.e. when tracks is 
> > assigned from one composer to another etc.

Detecting changes in Nepomuk is a complicated thing, which I don't want to mix 
with the currently discussed patch.

I suggest we discuss the Observer and update mechanisms together with it (and 
after we push this patch).


> On May 30, 2013, 2:09 p.m., Matěj Laitl wrote:
> > src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukCollection.cpp, lines 
> > 118-120
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108717/diff/11/?file=145267#file145267line118>
> >
> >     We can use review request "issues" as a TODO list.
> >     
> >     We may have to decide whether the methods should accept the "file" urls 
> > or just the "Nepomuk" ones, but this is the general problem of 
> > trackForUrl(). We could split these into trackForFileUrl() and 
> > trackForUidUrl() in TrackProvider.
> >     
> >     Thinking about it more, we don't hopefully need the split and file:// 
> > urls should be accepted here too (if the file is tracked by Nepomuk), 
> > CollectionManager can enforce some order whey querying TrackProviders.

> We can use review request "issues" as a TODO list.

I don't like it, to be honest. How about creating a bug instead? For example 
"consistent usage of trackForUrl in collections"


> On May 30, 2013, 2:09 p.m., Matěj Laitl wrote:
> > src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukConstructMetaJob.h, line 
> > 46
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108717/diff/11/?file=145268#file145268line46>
> >
> >     We prefer Qt equivalents of std classes, if they exist. But reading 
> > documentation of std::auto_ptr, it doesn't seem to make sense as a function 
> > argument, you doesn't seem to want to delete it as soon as it goes out of 
> > scope (and yeah, it may be reset by being on rhs of an assignment, but that 
> > is convoluted).

std::auto_ptr makes perfect sense as a function argument, because it both 
clearly shows who is responsible for the pointer deallocation and enforces it.


- Edward Hades


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108717/#review33230
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 20, 2013, 10:57 a.m., Edward Hades Toroshchin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108717/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 20, 2013, 10:57 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Amarok and Vishesh Handa.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> nepomuk: implement custom QueryMaker
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/CMakeLists.txt 
> 642919bd7b2188c6055308eabc07319ae48e14be 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukCache.h PRE-CREATION 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukCache.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukCollection.h 
> 5737cb5861563a8f190a29badc15d9e3ef82faf1 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukCollection.cpp 
> 8c35e3dda0e3dc9a23affe1d18cc69de4d24d58c 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukConstructMetaJob.h 
> 66e2473f16227f462c5a3838c71f311b6594333a 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukConstructMetaJob.cpp 
> 19743fe02b1d0c9dd4785d01909a4231b3a69e90 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukInquirer.cpp 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukParser.h PRE-CREATION 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukParser.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukQueryMaker.h 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukQueryMaker.cpp 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/NepomukSelectors.h PRE-CREATION 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukAlbum.h 
> 8456ddb8d952e130816d01fc312c8df3146e83d1 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukAlbum.cpp 
> 76c9136f9d4f5ba77cac49b242b3aa3b2d844c0c 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukArtist.h 
> 7cf533e760b0a06e5a2316693e13f6aea0ac3dcd 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukArtist.cpp 
> 34d7c8f9c32f96be0ef5f81de9d58bfedb510c2d 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukComposer.h 
> 837c37fa5dce5c3c10e6840f618cf72430b51b3d 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukComposer.cpp 
> 33ba85ae11100e8ccbb5cc94a2d7d0e2007fdbd1 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukGenre.cpp 
> c34831ab4812f0241c0000eef844c2ea2397ae97 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukLabel.h 
> 6f2e54c3c6a0d350615cea0e335ed9f5c5a0eedf 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukLabel.cpp 
> 7e2a313e5eac91128d0ce211c6575ac3d8d2b1ab 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukTrack.h 
> 9a534dddac51fc39f9d3705f95b194f9669416ab 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukTrack.cpp 
> b9beca872cd7c7edc3e6b15662d0a49f42213c6d 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukYear.h 
> 9eca44fbcd3aab77149d864cb6d3e5d266cc8461 
>   src/core-impl/collections/nepomukcollection/meta/NepomukYear.cpp 
> 1d6e3b1066e13fd6adba15ae6b1d81f8ca28a5d9 
>   src/statsyncing/collection/CollectionProvider.cpp 
> 7e3bdd83214796fc37e0aef41225baedabe3fbda 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108717/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Playing tracks from Nepomuk collection, browsing, filtering, adding/removing 
> labels, statistics sync.
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> 
>   
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/02/03/nepomuk-counting-querymaker.png
> 
>   
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/02/03/nepomuk-queries.png
> 
>   
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/02/03/nepomuk-sync.png
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Edward Hades Toroshchin
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Reply via email to