> On May 9, 2013, 6:11 p.m., Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> > Sorry, what does this patch have to do with the bug report? It doesn't fix 
> > the bug at all.
> > 
> > The command line argument issues are just a symptom of the underlying bug, 
> > see my comments in the report. I'm debugging this currently.
> 
> Anmol Ahuja wrote:
>     I'm sorry, it doesn't solve the complete problem.
>     
>     According to the bug report:
>     "Expected Results:
>     1) look for the actual song/url on the current playlist, or appending 
> that song to the playlist if not found; and
>     2) queue that song"
>     
>     So I added a -unique argument, though it doesn't fix the broken append 
> and play.
> 
> Matěj Laitl wrote:
>     > Sorry, what does this patch have to do with the bug report? It doesn't 
> fix the bug at all.
>     
>     I don't agree with this, please read the original description of the bug 
> again, Mark. This patch indeed could be the solution, however perhaps we just 
> want a different one. The problem described is that --queue just inserts the 
> track after the currently playing one, while it should use the Queue feature 
> of our playlist instead. Anmol, feel free to update the patch to solve this 
> point.
>     
>     The reporter also wanted that --queue wouldn't re-add (but just move) a 
> track if it is already in the playlist - I don't think we want to implement 
> this - it looks like the reporter wants to do fancy things with the command 
> line where DBus interface or Scripting API should be used instead.
> 
> Matěj Laitl wrote:
>     I don't see "Reopen for review" button, Marok of Anmol, please hit it, 
> this review shouldn't have been marked as discarded.
> 
> Anmol Ahuja wrote:
>     Okay.(Apparently, you're not notified of new comments on discarded 
> requests.)
>     And should I keep the unique argument? There was already some unused code 
> and an enum for it.
>
> 
> Anmol Ahuja wrote:
>     Mat?j: ^

Hmmm, I'd like it more if not, --unique looks as a too complicated operation 
for a command line argument.


- Matěj


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110362/#review32287
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 12, 2013, 1:24 p.m., Anmol Ahuja wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110362/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 12, 2013, 1:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Amarok.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added -unique argument to Amarok command line options.
> 
> 
> Bug Report: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317385
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 317385.
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317385
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/App.h 97dfdf2 
>   src/App.cpp 858d76d 
>   src/playlist/PlaylistActions.h 75b71fd 
>   src/playlist/PlaylistActions.cpp b36794d 
>   src/playlist/PlaylistModel.cpp c23de72 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110362/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anmol Ahuja
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Amarok-devel mailing list
Amarok-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel

Reply via email to