On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Patrick von Reth <vonr...@kde.org> wrote: >> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Matěj Laitl <ma...@laitl.cz> wrote: >> > On 8. 5. 2013 Patrick von Reth wrote: >> >> For the official builds we are still using gcc 4.4.7 and we probably >> >> won't >> >> switch to 4.8 before we switch to qt5. But for a amarok only build, I >> >> already did some testing and got a working build with gcc 4.8. For >> >> msvc, we >> >> are currently using msvc10, and won't switch to msvc12(which has c++11 >> >> support) before we switch to qt5. Cheers >> > >> > So I think this is the answer: C++11 only as soon Windows guys will >> > support >> > it. >> >> It's not really clear to me what Patrick meant to say. Is our build >> the "official" one? If not, how is this official build relevant to us? > With the official builds I meant the one we are releasing as KDE Windows. > But for the amarok installer I could use a different compiler. > Also the need of c++ x11 could motivate us to move to the new compiler a bit > earlier. > And as it would only be amarok for the beginning that would require c++11 > there would be no harm done to the guis providing Kontact, Calligra etc.
Using this nice C++11 compiler support comparison [1], I tried to determine which compiler versions could suffice as a baseline for us, supporting most of C++11's core features: GCC 4.6, Clang 3.1, MSVC 11. [1] http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport -- Mark Kretschmann Amarok Developer Fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe http://amarok.kde.org - http://fsfe.org _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
