Hi Lucas, On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Lucas Lira Gomes <x8luca...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > as the only GSoC project that isn't yet fully finished, I believe that I owe > you an explanation about its current status. I had worked a lot in it this > weekend and got several things done. > > To begin with, Libtomahawk often slows down my plans with some unexpected > but necessary last-minute refactoring. At the moment, for instance, I'm > solving some problems with tomahawk's #defines mess. After that, I expect it > to be "ready" for third-party usage. > > Likewise, It worth to mention that I had worked hard to minimise unnecessary > dependencies and that was one of the things that delayed my original > scheduled even more. That means, considering current implementation, we'll > need to include libechonest, libattica and quazip among our own > dependencies. > > With regard to how libtomahawk will be shipped, It'll be like our > amaroklibs. In other words, the user/packager would be able to choose at > compile time if he/she want to build only libtomahawk or the full tomahawk > app. Furthermore, Its headers files are already installed, so it'll be just > as an ordinary shared library at the end.
Thanks a lot for your feedback and for your work! > In spite of that, I believe I'm getting closer to a satisfactory state. > Just need some more work. Do you have a rough time frame you could give us for this? Regards, Myriam -- Proud member of the Amarok and KDE Community Protect your freedom and join the Fellowship of FSFE: http://www.fsfe.org Please don't send me proprietary file formats, use ISO standard ODF instead (ISO/IEC 26300) _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel