----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103999/#review17514 -----------------------------------------------------------
Personally I don't see the reason for a playground. If somebody want's to play around we can do a branch on the kde git server, a WIP review request or something else. The "playground" stuff is unmaintained since years. - Ralf Engels On Feb. 17, 2012, 2:53 a.m., Ryan McCoskrie wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103999/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 17, 2012, 2:53 a.m.) > > > Review request for Amarok. > > > Description > ------- > > This is infrastructure for future patches of mine. It's intended to (after > some revising) make it relatively easy to develop code that is (mostly) in > the playground directory but is (by necessity) compiled into the player > binary. > > Note: I'm only looking for criticism and have no intention of seeing this > shipped. > > > Diffs > ----- > > CMakeLists.txt d47c28b > playground/CMakeLists.txt e96aa3f > playground/src/CMakeLists.txt ed740ec > src/App.cpp 2f1837c > src/CMakeLists.txt 4241e69 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103999/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Checked that the code compiles. > > > Thanks, > > Ryan McCoskrie > >
_______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
