Variety Show Report

As required by the Variety Show agreement, I award points as follows
for the week ending September 2, 2007:

  a) 1 to root    (Proposal 5155, VI = 48)
  b) 1 to Levi    (Proposal 5152, VI = 0.2; 5150 also eligible)
  c) 1 to Zefram  (Proposal 5161, VI = 2, AI = 2; 5151 also eligible)
  d) 1 to Levi
  e) 1 to Wooble
  f) none
  g) 1 to root    (CFJ 1729; CFJs 1730, 1738 also eligible)
  h) none
  i) 1 to Zefram
  j) none
  *) 2 to root, 1 to Zefram

Contestants     Score     Gained this report
--------------------------------------------
BobTHJ            0                0
comex             1                0
Levi              2                1
root              6                5
Wooble            2                1
Zefram            6                3

Event history
-------------
Tue 14 Aug 05:10:09  Contest created
Tue 14 Aug 05:23:24  root   joins
Tue 14 Aug 05:32:31  Levi   joins
Tue 14 Aug 12:36:19  Zefram joins
Tue 14 Aug 14:32:58  comex  joins
Tue 14 Aug 14:42:34  BobTHJ joins
Sun 19 Aug 01:37:00  Agreement amended
Mon 20 Aug 13:04:59  Wooble joins
Fri 24 Aug 17:45:24  Agreement amended
----- time of last report -----
Fri 31 Aug 03:18:49  Agreement amended

Current text of agreement
-------------------------

  1) This agreement is a contest.

  2) The name of this agreement is The Variety Show.

  3) The contestmaster of this agreement is Murphy.

  4) Any player CAN join or leave this agreement by announcement.

  5) The contestmaster CAN amend this agreement without contestant
     objection.

  6) As soon as possible after the end of each week, the contestmaster
     SHALL award points in this order, skipping IMPOSSIBLE awards,
     breaking ties as e sees fit.

       a) 1 point to the author of the qualifying proposal with the
          highest finite voting index.  (A qualifying proposal is a
          proposal submitted by a contestant whose voting period ended
          during the week in question.)

       b) 1 point to the author of the qualifying proposal with the
          lowest non-zero voting index.

       c) 1 point to the author of the qualifying proposal with the
          smallest (absolute value) difference between adoption index
          and voting index.

       d) 1 point to a contestant who validly voted AGAINST the
          proposal from a).

       e) 1 point to a contestant who validly voted FOR the proposal
          from b).

       f) 1 point to a contestant who was an officer for part of the
          week, but not all of it.

       g) 1 point to a contestant who delivered judgement on time
          during the week.

       h) 1 point to a contestant who flipped eir posture from
          Supine to Sitting during the week.

       i) 1 point to a contestant who called for the judgement in g).

       j) 1 point to a contestant who is a partnership.

       *) Additional points as e sees fit.

Reply via email to