Back in late 90s...He was a friend of Coleman ISD IT guy....Lived off road to west of Coleman...Not 67... North of it...Tower was solid...I climbed it several times...
On Mar 6, 2017 7:56 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh Jesus. What was his name? > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> we erected two 45s face to face attached by Unistrut and clamps buried 6 >> ft down (5x5x6 pad) and went up 75 ft.. with 2 3 ft dishes...one at top and >> one at 45 ft. solid....got idea from a radio guy from Coleman, Texas. >> >> >> Jaime Solorza >> Wireless Systems Architect >> 915-861-1390 <(915)%20861-1390> >> >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:46 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Yep, just sharing experiences. I don't think you'd have a problem with >> 50-60 feet of 65G with a 2' dish and maybe a couple sectors. 65G is fairly >> stout. Or what about a light-duty monopole for your application? >> >> On 3/6/2017 5:36 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: >> >> I didn't say 55G, I wrote 65G... Would not even dream of trying to use >> 55G at the height and the wind loading I have in mind. >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:32 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I would highly recommend *against* using 55G free-standing at 50 feet. >> For an omni and a panel it's fine. Not a 2' dish, especially not 11-24GHz. >> Been there, done that. Customer installed it. Too much twisting in the wind. >> >> We have a customer with 2x 2' dishes with radomes on 80' of free-standing >> 65G and it has been fine. >> >> >> On 3/6/2017 3:56 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: >> >> I'm looking at the Rohn 65G (24" face width) for a 50-60 ft self >> supporting application. The site may eventually need more wind loading. >> There is no room for guy wires or anchors, just a single concrete block >> like foundation. >> >> Anyone have a suggestion for 36" face width tower pieces that can be used >> in a similar application to the 65G self supporting kits? >> >> -Eric >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
