FYI.  Maybe unrelated but I had an issue with sync on a 450i.

Mikrotik CRS --> Gigabit SyncInjector --> GIGE-APC-HV -- 260 foot shielded
cat-5 --> 450i.

Would loose sync briefly dozen times a day or so.  Increased voltage from
48 to 52 volts.  Issue went away, so far.  No sync loss in bit over week
anyway.

Identical setup with 210 foot of cable works fine with 48 volts.

These are only two I have deployed but more on way.



On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> We have recently become aware of a potential issue when using a
> SyncInjector with a PMP450i.  The short version of this issue is that with
> certain cable runs (mostly longer ones), a PMP450i will refuse to accept
> the sync from the SyncInjector as valid, even though the pulse is perfectly
> valid and should be accepted by the PMP450i.
>
> Currently, there are two ways this can be fixed.   Since the pulse is
> valid, but just not recognized as valid by the currently shipping PMP450i
> firmware, Cambium could fix this in software.   I believe they are
> currently investigating this as an issue, and I honestly expect them to
> release a fix assuming it isn't a major issue to do so.   If this happens,
> it should address all of the existing SyncInjectors in the field which our
> customers may want to use in the future with a a PMP450i.
>
> The second way to fix this issue is for us to modify our sync pulse
> slightly so that it is in line with what the PMP450i is expecting.
> Because this modification has some additional benefits beyond better
> interoperability with the current PMP450i firmware (such as the modified
> pulse being less likely to induct noise into adjoining cables), we have
> decided to proceed down this path as well.
>
> During the next week or so, we will begin shipping Revision I0 of our
> Gigabit SyncInjector Product.    The first of these are currently working
> their way through our assembly line.  This version contains improved
> support for voltages above 58V and also the waveform modification mentioned
> above.   It should be functionally identical to the earlier Revision H0
> SyncInjectors.   It is not our intention to update our non-gigabit
> injectors at this time.
>
> If you are currently having problems with sync over power on a Gigabit
> SyncInjector and a PMP450i, please send an email into
> [email protected] and we will work with you to ensure you have
> hardware which will work with your hardware.
>
> --
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
>   <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>
>

Reply via email to