I don't like fcc mandates but if they were to make one that should be it On Jun 24, 2015 10:26 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's not ATPC, just SM uplink power control. Just like the old Trango > 5800/5830 SU power leveling, but that didn't run in the background every > two minutes like Canopy does today. It's an absolute must on synchronized > systems like Canopy and ePMP where you're running the same channel back to > back. Close hot SMs will hurt the opposite sector's ability to hear its > SMs. Notice they don't let you turn this off on the 450, but you can set it > to something stupid like -40. I set it at -57 (-60 per pol) system wide and > it seems to work well. > > On 6/24/2015 6:37 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Also EPMP has atpc. It does a great job. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Jun 24, 2015 7:35 PM, "Daniel White" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I was under the impression Canopy (450, not EPMP) did that today. I’d >> guess LTE systems maybe do as well? >> >> >> >> Daniel White >> >> (303) 746-3590 >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman >> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 24, 2015 5:31 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] saf 11ghz lumina status >> >> >> >> A great idea. I'm one of those that think it should be required in 802.11. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Jun 24, 2015 7:29 PM, "Daniel White" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Also theoretically reduces interference. >> >> >> >> ATPC even on unlicensed links is a good idea. >> >> >> >> >> *************************************************************************** >> >> Daniel White >> >> SAF North America LLC >> >> Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 >> >> [email protected] >> >> Skype: danieldwhite >> Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84> >> >> >> >> >> *************************************************************************** >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman >> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:35 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] saf 11ghz lumina status >> >> >> >> >extend the overall life of the radio head >> >> That's definitely nice to know! >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Daniel White <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Okay so a little knowledge goes a long way :-) >> >> >> >> The MSE value is fine. There are charts in the manual that describe >> required MSE per modulation. MSE is something like SNR, but different. >> Anyways your value is good. >> >> >> >> ATPC is a great tool. Number one failure of any radio is related to the >> TX part of the radio… so the lower the TX power, the less stress on vital >> components. I absolutely recommend ATPC, on any vendors radio (assuming it >> is implemented well) to extend the overall life of the radio head. >> >> >> >> Hope that all helps! >> >> >> >> >> *************************************************************************** >> >> Daniel White >> >> SAF North America LLC >> >> Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 <%2B1%20%28303%29%20746-3590> >> >> [email protected] >> >> Skype: danieldwhite >> Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84> >> >> >> >> >> *************************************************************************** >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy >> /sarcasm >> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 24, 2015 12:53 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] saf 11ghz lumina status >> >> >> >> this is just over a ten mile hop, it had gotten out of alignment we went >> up. the target was -43 on the original install and we met that then, no >> degredation since we realigned it. >> >> I had never turned on ATPC, but when it was out of alignment one side was >> -54 and still at full modulataion, so I turned it on with the target 50-55, >> TX power is now staying at 8. >> >> >> >> I wonder though if that stress value is something I should be concerned >> about, I dont know what is good or bad. >> >> >> >> I like keeping things neat on the rf side where I can, having that extra >> 10db power seems reasonable for fade, but I dont want to be cooking a >> chipset doing so >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >> >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >> >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >> >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >> >> >
