I'm not sure what options there are for connectorized antennas, but I suspect that it's going to be a lot cheaper to just use reflector dishes - also, with that kind of signal levels, it's likely that you will be able to just use a bare SM for some of them.
I'm not certain what KP has for 3.65 sectors, but you definitely do not want to use a Ubiquiti sector - they're horizontal/vertical and Canopy uses dual slant. >From what I've seen, all the master distributors have the same pricing on Cambium gear. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Darin Steffl <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey guys, > > We have not yet tried any of the PMP 450 gear in 3.65 and wondering if you > have any advice and info on how we can successfully try one sector. We have > 8 customers on a 2.4 Ubiquiti sector with heavy interference and we need > them off that ASAP. They're all within 1 mile of tower site with signals > from -50 to -65 on nanobeams and they all fall within a 90 degree coverage > pattern. > > Would we be better off buying the bare SM's with a reflector dish or > getting the connectorized version and finding a panel or dish antenna? Any > recommendations for either kind of antenna? > > We should be fine with the Lite-AP for now since we have under 10 > customers we want to trial this with. For doing standalone, do we need the > CMM of Packetflux gear or can we just purchase standalone power supply and > GPS antennas? > > Should we use the standard Cambium recommend 90 degree antenna or would > you recommend another brand like KP Performance or Ubiquiti? > > Also, who would have best price on Cambium gear with our normal discount? > We purchase from Streakwave and Doubleradius and wondering if other master > distributors might have better pricing than these two? > > If I think of anything else, I'll fire it off to the list. > > Thank you > > -- > Darin Steffl > Minnesota WiFi > www.mnwifi.com > 507-634-WiFi > <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook > <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> >
