first world problems. :) ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeremy To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat
Anyone have issues with Verizon dropping VPN connections? It always worked fine when I was rooted and using VPNRoot, but I had to swap my phone and the new software doesn't have an exploit yet. The stock VPN app will connect long enough to load a page then disconnect. I have to re-connect like ten or twenty times just to accomplish a task. On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: I couldn't find any official pricing, but what I saw for Sprint just mentioned the $3/month. https://www.sprint.com/business/solutions/sprint_enablers/sprint_datalink_and_static_ip/index.html#.VQ7SEO7F-ts ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 9:27:42 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat If you wanted an static IP on cellular network they will charge you 500 dollars to set it up then 3-5 dollars an month for an the static IP. Source: http://www.verizonwireless.com/businessportals/support/faqs/DataServices/faq_static_ip.html https://www.wireless.att.com/businesscenter/solutions/connectivity/ip-addressing.jsp so I dont know if you want to set up static IP address with verizon with that deep setup cost. On 2015-03-21 22:40, John Woodfield wrote: > That is kind of what I was thinking. > > John Woodfield, President > > Delmarva WiFi Inc. > > 410-870-WiFi > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 10:38pm > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat > > I think probably yes, but as not routable beyond your network. It’s > space that should never exist in customer networks or the public > Internet. And since it’s not publicly routable, I can use it, you > can use it, Comcast and Verizon can use it over and over. > > So instead of picking some obscure range in RFC1918 space like > 10.199.x.x to hand out to your customers and hoping none of them use > those addresses internally, you could use the CGN space. > > I’m sure there is additional stuff that I don’t understand that > makes it “carrier grade”. > > FROM: John Woodfield > SENT: Saturday, March 21, 2015 9:17 PM > TO: [email protected] > SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat > > So is this address space available for our use? > > 100.64.0.0/10 > > John Woodfield, President > > Delmarva WiFi Inc. > > 410-870-WiFi > > -----Original Message----- > From: "TJ Trout" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2015 7:01pm > To: [email protected] > Subject: [AFMUG] verizon wireless nat > > Is it me or does verizon wireless nat customers and not allow inbound > traffic? i.e. hosting a server, I just setup a mikrotik connected to > the internet via a usb modem and I can't even ping or login to it's IP
