That may be a good point Ken. I am using the SDR term in the sense that Vanu Bose used it, who is one of the inventors. He explained this to me and other invited panelists on the FCC's Spectrum Policy Task Force in 2002. I'm using it in the sense of materially changing a piece of equipment from one protocol to another entirely via software independent of the hardware.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID On Mar 4, 2015 1:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: Why is it not software defined? Because DAN owned the core WIMAX software? Purewave claimed to have purchased the rights to make their own mods, that was one of their claimed advantages over PMP320. Not sure what Mercury would say now. But don't they have a proprietary enhanced (but not LTE) version now? I don't see how they do that if it's not a SDR. I assume we are talking about the part of Purewave that went to Mercury, not the part that went to Redline. If you mean was it designed to do both WIMAX and LTE with just a different software load, no, they never claimed that AFAIK. -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Englhardt Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 12:30 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback (Patrick Leary) >PW is not SDR based So call their Distributors and tell them to change their announcements. Just google Purwave and SDR and you find some. ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************ ************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses. ************************************************************************************
