You should read the stuff out of Davos. Part of what you say is true, the European nations are/were followers, but tRump has that all changing as fast as they can. The leader of Canada said what was on all the leadership of the free world is now thinking and that is basically forgetting about alignment with the US.  We used to have the most of the world following our lead.  That is now OVER.  Guess what comes next. The other countries are going to start building their own stuff for all that we sold them as fast as they can figure it out. Sweden, Germany, England, etc.. are going to be building/selling advanced systems like crazy and where they get the raw materials? Not the US...  Right now other leadership is looking at China as a much more reliable trading partner than the US.

On 1/23/26 12:23 PM, David Hannum via AF wrote:
I disagree.  I don't think our allies distrust us. They don't LIKE lots of what Trump does, I think they see strength.  I think they see "America First" and they respect that because they understand that as the USA goes, they go. They need a stron, unapologetic US who will stick their finger in the face of Russia and China.  They need us to be like that because they can't/won't be like that for themselves.  The European nations are all followers - not leaders.  Biden & Obama did not lead.  Obama was apologetic of the success of the US.  My biggest fear is what comes AFTER Trump?  Every country in the world can't be equal.  Nothing gets done.  And China and Russia aren't going to play that game.

Dave

On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 3:13 PM Bill Prince <[email protected]> wrote:

    It's still totally unnecessary, and does nothing but create
    confusion and distrust. If you want our allies to distrust us,
    then do shit like this.

    May actually be too late. They already distrust us, and China and
    Russia are loving it. Just look at what Carney said.

    Stick an arrow pointing out of his ass, and that's probably where
    we should be going.

    bp
    <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

    On 1/22/2026 9:07 AM, David Hannum via AF wrote:
    Even if it is what existed before, the world is on notice that we
    are planning to deploy defense systems there.  So yea, it's still
    a win and Trump can take a victory lap (like he needs a reason .
    . . )

    Dave

    On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 11:47 AM Bill Prince
    <[email protected]> wrote:

        Even though it was Wednesday, I will call it a TACO day
        (follow the stock market).

        There are zero details of what the "deal" is or isn't, and
        I'm betting it's essentially what existed before.

        Prove me wrong.


        bp
        <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

        On 1/22/2026 7:43 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:
        Looks like Trump got the deal he wanted.  Everyone is happy :).

        Rory

        On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 7:11 AM MVTVWISPA
        <[email protected]> wrote:

            David-

            I too read that exact information from Facebook posts
            word for word.

            *From:*AF <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *David
            Hannum via AF
            *Sent:* Wednesday, January 21, 2026 3:33 PM
            *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <[email protected]>
            *Cc:* David Hannum <[email protected]>
            *Subject:* [AFMUG] OT - Greenland

            So many think Trump is a bully on Greenland . . . If you
            think he's so terrible, you absolutely don’t know history.

            1)  1867 – Andrew Johnson: explored buying Greenland &
            Iceland (right after Alaska).

            2) WWII – FDR: U.S. took over Greenland’s defense while
            Denmark was occupied.
            3)  1946 – Truman: offered $100M in gold to buy it.
            4)  Cold War – Eisenhower → Kennedy: nonstop
            negotiations for bases, radar, missiles.
            5)  Post–Cold War – Clinton/Bush/Obama: expanded Arctic
            security & missile defense.
            6)  2019 – Trump: said publicly what presidents
            discussed privately for 150+ years.

            The U.S. didn’t “suddenly” want Greenland.
            It’s been defending it, negotiating it, and embedding
            there since the 1800s.
            Greenland = Arctic power, shipping lanes, missiles,
            minerals.
            Trump didn’t invent it. His crime is he said the quiet
            part out loud.

            =======================

            NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said on Jan. 21 at the
            World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, that Trump
            is spot on about the importance of Greenland to
            security.  He said, "When it comes to the Arctic, I
            think President Trump is right. Other leaders in NATO
            are right. We need to defend the Arctic. There are eight
            countries bordering on the Arctic. Seven are members of
            NATO. That’s Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland,
            Canada, and the U.S.,” Rutte said.
            "And there’s only one country bordering on the Arctic
            outside NATO, and that’s Russia. And I would argue there
            is a ninth country, which is China, which is
            increasingly active in the Arctic region. So, President
            Trump and other leaders are right, we have to do more
            there; we have to protect the Arctic."

            Dave Hannum

-- AF mailing list
            [email protected]
            http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- AF mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- AF mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


-- 
AF mailing list
[email protected]
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to