Cambium support just says it sucks to be you, blame the AFC. Hard to sell expensive radios if that’s the answer.
> On Jul 23, 2025, at 3:48 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: > > That doesn't sound right. If the Part 101 system is on a 60 MHz channel, > that's all that should be blocked out. Maybe one adjacent channel each side > for OOBE? > > I'm not expert on how AFC works, but there's a lot of spectrum in U-NII-5 and > U-NII-7, I can't believe AFC would block out most of it unless there are a > bunch of priority users within range. > > Maybe contact Richard Bernhardt at WISPA. Or Cambium uses Qualcomm for AFC, > contact them, maybe they will investigate. If they can't fix it, maybe they > can tell you why. > > -----Original Message----- > From: AF <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dev > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 5:26 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [AFMUG] challenging AFC 6Ghz? > > We have a Cambium ePMP 4600 4x4 90 deg sector sitting 5 mountain tops from > the nearest 6GHz point source, but straight-line but AFC thinks it might > interfere (I guess), which could only happen on flat midwestern cornfield > perhaps. Not to mention 6GHz fades after about 5-6 miles. It’s therefore > stripped the whole 6GHz band down to one 20MHz channel available. Is there > any way to challenge AFC? > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > > -- > AF mailing list > [email protected] > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com -- AF mailing list [email protected] http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
