On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 03:05:12PM +0100, Andrew Dunbar wrote: > It will probably make our UT_iconv stuff a lot > simpler if it becomes a wrapper only for g_iconv as > long as we can trust g_iconv as well as we can trust > our current iconv trickery (:
I now had a look at http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/glib/glib-character-set-conversion.html and it looks like the equivalent of UT_iconv is g_convert, not so much g_iconv. -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin
msg24002/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
