--- Karl Ove Hufthammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Tomas Frydrych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > in > 3CC57D83.21504.97D3F4@localhost:">news:3CC57D83.21504.97D3F4@localhost: > > > utf-8 requires more processing time for all > people, > > And there is (AFAIK) *no* advantage to use UTF-8 > over UTF-16.
UTF-8 is easier to get right for the characters that fall into the area that would require surrogates in UTF-16. > > utf-32 more memory for most people. > > For *all* people. Almost all characters fit in > UTF-16 without > using surrogates, and certainly all the most > commonly characters > do. Surrogates will be very rare. Most Chinese documents will have a couple since many common Chinese names require characters that are very uncommon outside of family names. Andrew Dunbar. > -- > Karl Ove Hufthammer ===== http://linguaphile.sourceforge.net http://www.abisource.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com
