"Tomas Frydrych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in 3CC57D83.26459.97D3E6@localhost:">news:3CC57D83.26459.97D3E6@localhost:
> Currently are not consistent. The Win32 build uses utf-8, > Linux the encoding of current locale. The advantage of using > the locale encoding is the size of the file, for unless you > use only characters from basic ASCII, utf-8 needs at least two > bytes for each. The other advantage of using the locale > encoding is that the user can view/search, etc. the raw files. > This is quite important to a number of users, and I think we > should retain this. On the other hand, XML parsers are only *required* to support 'UTF-8' and 'UTF-16' (and some do only support this). -- Karl Ove Hufthammer
