M�ndag 22. april 2002 11:36 skreiv Andrew Dunbar: > As far as I know, this only holds for UTF-32 == UCS-4. > UTF-16 supports surrogates and UCS-2 does not.
I didn't know this. Thanks for the information. BTW, AFAICS, there actually was a UCS-xx which was identical to UTF-16, UCS-2E (a proposal, which later turned into UTF-16, according to <URL: http://www.terena.nl/multiling/unicode/utf16.html >). -- Karl Ove Hufthammer
