to 09 aug 2001 09:53:46, "Jared Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> For some time now I have been working on a review of AbiWord's
> interface. 

I agree with *most* of your points. Here's some comments (mostly 
on things I don't agree with, or things that need clearifying): 

---

Goal 1: The interface is responsive.

Yes! The first thing I did when opening the document, was 
selecting all the text and change the font to 'Myriad Web' font. 
That took quite a while�...

---

Appendix:

8. Add description of action in undo option in edit menu, i.e.
    �undo bold� (1.1.3) 

Note: This must be localizable.

---

16. Replace Date and Time dialog in insert menu with a sub-menu 
(1.1.5)

Perhaps the top menu-item could be the default date format for the 
current language (and/or locale). This should be separated from 
the other format by a horizontal line.

Also, it should be possible to insert the current date/time as a 
field. (But this wouldn't work well as a sub-menu, only as a 
dialogue.)

---

18. Remove Field and AutoText options from insert menu. (1.1.5)

*No*, fields have proven *very* useful. The current AutoText 
implementation on the other hand, is rather useless. 

---

20. Change format menu Columns option to use a sub-menu. (1.1.6)

I disagree. (No particular reason; I just prefer a dialogue for 
this (and the preview is very nice).)

---

21. Remove format menu�s Tabs option. (1.1.6)

I disagree. And one general point to have in mind is that *all* 
features avilable from the toolbar *must* be available using the 
menus/dialogues. Not everybody *can* use a mouse.

---

23 Implement an embedded sub-menu for Format menu�s background 
option. (1.1.6)

I agree. And note that 'No fill' *is* very useful. There's a big 
difference to this and 'white' when the background colour isn't 
white (or positioning a (text/graphics) frame over something).

Oh, and frames (as in Word's implementation, or preferable as 
linked text boxes (where content can flow between several boxes)) 
are useful. You can do pretty nifty things with frames and styles 
in Word.

---

Lose the distinction between �style� and �effects�.  In other 
words, instead of using a list box for the bold and italics 
options, use check-boxes like we do for all of the other styles.

*No*. Most fonts include only italics, bold and bold italics, but 
there are fonts with many more styles/weights (e.g. 'black', 
'semi-bold', 'small-caps').

---

25. (Possibly) automatically choose bidirectional text option from 
language choice. (1.1.6)

See HTML 4.01, CSS 2 and Unicode for details on this.

---

27. Possibly consider removing Formatting menu�s text attributes, 
alignment options. (1.1.6)

No. :)

---

28. Remove the Document option from the Format menu. (1.1.6)

I strongly agree, but have one question: Does this bring up a 
different dialogue on non-Windows platforms?

---

35. Rename Preferences to AbiWord Options in Tools menu. (1.1.7)

No, most Windows applications have changed this *to* 
'Preferences'.

---

47. Add ability to type font names and sizes into the combo boxes. 
(1.2.2)

<URL: http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1235 >

---

56. Change symbol dialog to be able to resize, have symbols grow. 
(1.3.2)

How about a complete workover? See <URL: 
http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237 >.

-- 
Karl Ove Hufthammer

Reply via email to