>   May be I was understood wrong. I proposed to add another menu item to 
>File
>menu, called "print directly", that will pop the gtk dialog up. I didn't
>propse to hack gnome-print dialog to also allow printing via plain unix 
>code,
>and I didn't propose to remove gnome-print dialog too. I was suggesting to 
>add
>another menu item (may be even hidden for latin1 locales) to popup gtk 
>dialog.
>
>   User should have a choice IMO. May be some bug will popup in gnome-print
>that will prevent the use of gnome build for some users. Just writing 
>20-line
>patch to fix this potential problem might be reasonable idea.

This is exactly what I meant by "I don't want it." The user should not be 
given a choice to "print non-iso8895-1" and a choice to just "print." The 
user should see one choice: print. If you want "print" to rely on our PS 
code instead of gnome-print, well that is a different (and better, IMO) 
argument that I have not seen made here so far.

Dom

Dom
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com




Reply via email to