This may be useful for the /48 thing: http://www.ipv6tf.org/news/newsroom.php?id=604
For the NAT with IPv6: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-00.tx t Regards, Jordi > De: Ken Raeburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Fecha: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 01:24:29 -0400 > Para: Antonio Querubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: Michael Sturtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Asunto: Re: [6bone] Network Address translation question > > On Jun 10, 2005, at 23:06, Antonio Querubin wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Ken Raeburn wrote: >> >>> I think the general plan was that if you're giving out addresses, >>> usually you should give out at least a /64, which will let the >>> customer >> >> Actually the IAB/IESG general recommendation is to give out a /48. See >> RFC 3177. Doesn't make sense to give out anything smaller since you >> can >> get at least that much using 6to4. > > Was it? I must've remembered wrong, I thought cable providers etc were > likely to give the /64s. Thanks for the correction. > > Ken > > _______________________________________________ > 6bone mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone ************************************ Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit Registration open. Information available at: http://www.ipv6-es.com This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited. _______________________________________________ 6bone mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/6bone
