It's on a VM.

I don't have enough archived logs to show the progression of the serial number. 
However, I do have a text dump of the cldb, and I can filter it down to just 
the CSNs, and then to just the CSNs originated on this replica. The timestamp 
with the most CSNs is 752, and, of the 3323 unique timestamps, only 13 have 
more than 100 CSNs, only 267 have 10 or more, and 1299 are just a single change.

Here's the list, if you really want to look: https://pastebin.com/muegmwzV

I can't come up with a rationale for the numbers, honestly. They should just 
start at zero for each unique timestamp, right?

> IIUC the consumer is currently catching up. Is the RUV, on the consumer, 
> evolving ?

Based on the one set of debug logs, yes, but I'm not sure if that's an anomaly 
or not. I haven't been able to see it move since then, but I'm keeping an eye 
on it.

> Do you have fractional replication ?

Yes. This is actually part of an IdM/FreeIPA installation, so the regular 
things that are stripped out there:

nsds5ReplicaStripAttrs: modifiersName modifyTimestamp internalModifiersName 
internalModifyTimestamp
nsDS5ReplicatedAttributeList: (objectclass=*) $ EXCLUDE memberof idnssoaserial 
entryusn krblastsuccessfulauth krblastfailedauth krbloginfailedcount
nsDS5ReplicatedAttributeListTotal: (objectclass=*) $ EXCLUDE entryusn 
krblastsuccessfulauth krblastfailedauth krbloginfailedcount

-- 
William Faulk
--
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to