Morgan,
this actually doesn't work because there is only this part in cosine.schema
definition in OpenLDAP:
objectclass ( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.15 NAME 'dNSDomain'
SUP domain STRUCTURAL
MAY ( ARecord $ MDRecord $ MXRecord $ NSRecord $
SOARecord $ CNAMERecord )
)
although I can convert this part of cosine.schema for 389 DS there are
still its attributes missing in DS389:
*ERR - dse_read_one_file - The entry cn=schema in file
/etc/dirsrv/slapd-tbrandysky/schema/02cosine.ldif (lineno: 1) is invalid,
error code 21 (Invalid syntax) - object class dNSDomain: Unknown allowed
attribute type "ARecord"*
These attributes used in dnsdomain schemma seem to be part of OpenLDAP out
of the box as I couldn't find them in any schema file. That seems to be the
dead end for me as to migration from OpenLDAP.
Any ideas?
Thank you
Tomas
On 25 September 2017 at 18:21, Morgan Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> Tomas,
>
> Can you convert the dnsdomain schema from OpenLDAP? I recognize it’s a
> potential rabbit hole as there may be schemas that depend on that that you
> have to convert and so on but it could be worth the effort rather than
> abandoning your 389 project.
>
> -morgan
>
>
> > On Sep 25, 2017, at 4:13 AM, Tomáš Brandýský <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Morgan,
> >
> > there is no problem with converting the schema.
> > Like I wrote I managed to convert the PowerDNS schema but this schema is
> just extending 'dnsdomain' schema which is actually part of OpenLDAP and
> was part of 389 DS in the past. As dnsdomain schema is not part of 389 DS
> anymore all other schemas trying to use it can't be loaded either.
> >
> > This is how PowerDNS extends dnsdomain schema which doesn't exist in 389
> DS:
> >
> > objectClasses: (
> > 1.3.6.1.4.1.2428.20.2
> > NAME 'dNSDomain2'
> > SUP 'dNSDomain'
> > STRUCTURAL
> > MAY ( DNSTTL $ DNSClass $ WKSRecord $ PTRRecord $ HINFORecord $
> MINFORecord $ TXTRecord $ RPRecord $ AFSDBRecord $ SIGRecord $ KEYRecord $
> GPOSRecord $ AAAARecord $ LOCRecord $ NXTRecord $ SRVRecord $ NAPTRRecord
> $ KXRecord $ CERTRecord $ A6Record $ DNAMERecord $ APLRecord $ DSRecord $
> SSHFPRecord $ IPSECKEYRecord $ RRSIGRecord $ NSECRecord $ DNSKEYRecord $
> DHCIDRecord $ SPFRecord )
> > )
> >
> > Tomas
> >
> >
> >
> > On 24 September 2017 at 04:12, Morgan Jones <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Tomas,
> >
> > It’s been a while since I’ve done it but I seem to remember it being
> relatively straightforward to convert between OpenLDAP's and 389’s schema
> formats. Have you made an attempt to convert the PowerDNS schema?
> >
> > -morgan
> >
> >
> > > On Sep 22, 2017, at 6:13 AM, Tomáš Brandýský <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > in our company we're working on project of migration multiple
> master-slave synchronized OpenLDAP servers to multi-master 389 DS servers
> configuration.
> > >
> > > We've been using OpenLDAP to store data of multiple applications such
> as DNS servers (PowerDNS), DHCP servers, Mail servers (Postfix, Amavis)
> etc..for at least 9 years.
> > >
> > > We need to use custom LDAP schemas to store the data of these
> applications in LDAP. These need to be converted from OpenLDAP format to
> RFC strict 389 DS convenient format which actually works great for most of
> them.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately I didn't manage to use PowerDNS LDAP schema (
> https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/backends/ldap.html) with 389 DS.
> As I tried to google more information why this schema doesn't work with 389
> DS I found out it uses 'dnsdomain' schema which comes with OpenLDAP (
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/2011-
> January/012721.html) and was removed from 389 DS many years ago.
> > >
> > > Could you please give me some advice what can I do to make PowerDNS
> backend work with 389 DS ?
> > >
> > > We're mid-sized company with many services using LDAP as their storage
> backend and to migrate all of them to new LDAP servers is priority number
> one. If there is no way to migrate PowerDNS LDAP data from OpenLDAP to 389
> DS the whole project of migration to 389 DS would need to be reconsidered.
> Nevertheless I don't understand why such a worldwide popular DNS server
> which PowerDNS surely is couldn't be used with 389 DS LDAP implementation
> which is also quite popular.
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > >
> > > Tomas Brandysky
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > 389-users mailing list -- [email protected]
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@lists.
> fedoraproject.org
> >
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
