On Thu, 26 Jan 2017, Jonathan Corbet <cor...@lwn.net> wrote: > Give me a new kerneldoc that passes those tests, and I'll happily > merge it. (I have some sympathy with the idea that we should look > into other parsers, but I would not hold up a new kerneldoc that > passed those tests on this basis alone.)
I'll just note in passing that having another parser that actually works for our needs might be a pink unicorn pony. It might exist, it might not, and someone would have to put in the hours to try to find it, tame it, and bring it to the kernel. But it would be awesome to have. Switching to a homebrew Python parser first does not preclude a unicorn hunt later. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
